Scheimpflug Sirius Topotomographer with Images for the Study of the Anterior Segment
Keywords:
Scheimpflug Sirius topotomographer with images, digital visualization, anterior segment.Abstract
Introduction: Digital visualization of the anterior segment of the eye is becoming increasingly important. For this purpose, several pieces of equipment have been designed to determine measurements and systematic evaluations of great usefulness in clinical and surgical performance, as well as very important in ophthalmology. The Sirius Scheimpflug topotomographer with images allows an anterior segment analysis system that combines corneal topography with Placido rings and anterior segment tomography with Scheimpflug 3D rotating camera.
Objective: To describe the usefulness of the Sirius topotomographer for the study of the anterior segment.
Methods: A search for updated information was conducted, regarding the use and principles of this equipment’s operation. Of the 50 found sources, 37 were selected; while, according to the inclusion criteria, full articles, original articles, bibliographic reviews and case presentations were taken into account. The information databases SciELO, Medscape, Elsevier, Google Scholar, Research and PubMed were used, in their English and Spanish versions.
Conclusions: The Scheimpflug Sirius topotomographer with images is a useful tool for ophthalmologists. The provided data will allow the diagnosis and follow-up of various anterior segment diseases with greater precision, which will contribute to improving the methods and procedures providing the patient with better visual outcomes.
Downloads
References
Fernández L, Sánchez L, Cárdenas D. Cierre angular primario. En: Río M, Fernández L, Hernández J, Ramos M. Oftalmología, diagnóstico y tratamiento. 2 ed. La Habana: Ed Ciencias Médicas; 2018. p. 111-5.
Yan C, Han Y, Yu Y, Wang W, Lyu D, Tang Y, et al. Effects of lens extraction versus laser peripheral iridotomy on anterior segment morphology in primary angle closure suspect. Graefes Arch Clin Exp Ophthalmol. 2019 [acceso 22/09/223];257(7):1473-80. Disponible en: https://pubmed.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/31079203/
Radhakrishnan S, Chen P, Junk A, Nouri-Mahdavi K, Chen T. Laser Peripheral Iridotomy in Primary Angle Closure. Ophthalmology. 2018;125(7). DOI: https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ophtha.2018.01.015
Gil-Martínez T, Brazón M, Cedeño O, Alfonso C. Variación de la presión intraocular y medidas cuantitativas del segmento anterior pre y posiridotomía en pacientes sospechosos de cierre angular primario. Rev Mex Oftalmol. 2019 [acceso 25/08/2023];93(1):14-8. Disponible en: https://www.medigraphic.com/pdfs/revmexoft/rmo-2019/rmo191c.pdf
Chan P, Pang J, Tham C. Acute primary angle closure-treatment strategies, evidences and economical considerations. Eye (Lond). 2019;33(1):110-9. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1038/s41433-018-0278-x
Sihota R, Angmo D, Ramaswamy D, Dada T. Simplifying "target" intraocular pressure for different stages of primary open-angle glaucoma and primary angle-closure glaucoma. Indian J Ophthalmol. 2018;66(4):495-505. DOI: https://doi.org/10.4103/ijo.IJO_1130_17
Yousefian A, Shokoohi-Rad S, Abbaszadegan M, Rad D, Zargari S, Milanizadeh S, et al. Primary angle closure glaucoma-associated genetic polymorphisms in northeast Iran. J Ophthalmic Vis Res. 2020;15(1):4552. DOI: https://doi.org/10.18502/jovr.v15i1.5942
Xu B, Friedman D, Foster P, Jiang Y, Porporato N, Pardeshi A, et al. Ocular biometric risk factors for progression of primary angle closure disease: the zhongshan angle closure prevention trial. Ophthalmology. 2022;129(3):267-75. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ophtha.2021.10.003
Pradhan Z, Shroff S, Bansod A, Poornachandra B, Shetty A, Devi S, et al. Prevalence of primary angle-closure disease in retinitis pigmentosa. Indian J Ophthalmol. 2022;70(7):2449-51. DOI: https://doi.org/10.4103/ijo.IJO_3189_21
Parikh S, Parikh R. Clinical implication of recent randomized control trial in primary angle-closure disease management. Indian J Ophthalmol. 2022;70(8):2825-34. DOI: https://doi.org/10.4103/ijo.IJO_1807_21
Xu B, Friedman D, Foster P, Jiang Y, Pardeshi A, Jiang Y, et al. Anatomic changes and predictors of angle widening after laser peripheral iridotomy: the Zhongshan angle closure prevention trial. Ophthalmology. 2021;128(8):1161-8. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ophtha.2021.01.021
Chan P, Pang J, Tham C. Acute primary angle closure-treatment strategies, evidences and economical considerations. Eye (Lond). 2019;33(1):110-9. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1038/s41433-018-0278-x
Wen J, Rezaei K, Lam D. Laser peripheral iridotomy curriculum: lecture and simulation practical. MedEdPORTAL. 2020;16:10903. DOI: https://doi.org/10.15766/mep_2374-8265.10903
Ichhpujani P, Thakur S, Singh T, Singh R, Kumar S. Effect of laser peripheral iridotomy on contrast sensitivity using Spaeth/Richman contrast sensitivity test. Ther Adv Ophthalmol. 2022. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1177/2515841422107 8142
Lowe R. The natural history and principles of treatment of primary angleclosure glaucoma. Am J Ophthalmol. 1966;61(4):642-51. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1016/0002-9394(66)91200-1
Pant A, Gogte P, Pathak-Ray V, Dorairaj S, Amini R. Increased iris stiffness in patients with a history of angle-closure glaucoma: an imagebased inverse modeling analysis. Invest Ophthalmol Vis Sci. 2018;59(10):4134-42. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1167/iovs.18-24327
Pérez-González H, Moreno-Domínguez J, Moreno-González L, García-Concha Y. Factores que influyen en la progresión del cierre angular primario posterior a iridotomía periférica láser. Rev Ciencias Médicas. 2020 [acceso 22/09/223];24(5):1-9. Disponible en: https://www.medigraphic.com/cgibin/new/resumen.cgi?IDARTICULO=103129
Mansoori T, Balakrishna N. Anterior segment morphology after laser iridotomy in primary angle closure suspects. Clin Exp Optom. 2018;101(3):333-8. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1111/cxo.12631
Wei L, Fu Y, Pan W, Nie L, Chen Y, Liu G, et al. Accuracy of optimized Sirius ray-tracing method in intraocular lens power calculation. Int J Ophthalmol. 2022;15(2):228-32. DOI: https://doi.org/10.18240/ijo.2022.02.06
Fouda S, Al-Nashar H, Ibrahim B, Bor'i A. Predictability of Sirius dualscanning corneal tomography in the measurement of corneal power after photorefractive surgery. Int Ophthalmol. 2016;36(1):8590. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s10792-015-0075-5
Salmon J. Glaucoma. En: Salmon J. Kanski. Oftalmología clínica. Un enfoque sistemático. 9 ed. España: Elsevier; 2021. p.346-22.
Pérez H, Moreno J, Moreno L, García Y. Epidemiología del cierre angular primario en Pinar del Río. Rev Ciencias Médicas. 2019 [acceso 13/08/2023];23(4):523-32. Disponible en: http://scielo.sld.cu/scielo.php?script=sci_arttext&pid=S156131942019000400523&lng=es
Baskaran M, Kumar R, Friedman D, Lu Q, Wong H, Chew P. The Singapore asymptomatic narrow angles laser iridotomy study: five-year results of a randomized controlled trial. Ophthalmology. 2022;129(2):147-58. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ophtha.2022.08.017
Radhakrishnan S, Chen P, Junk A, Nouri-Mahdavi K, Chen T. Laser peripheral iridotomy in primary angle closure. A report by the American Academy of Ophthalmology. Ophthalmology. 2019;125(7):1110-20. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ophtha
Pei X, Wang S, Sun X, Chen H, Wang B, Li S. Predictors of angle widening after laser iridotomy in chinese patients with primary angle-closure suspect using ultrasound biomicroscopy. Int J Ophthalmol. 2022;15(2):233-41. DOI: https://doi.org/10.18240/ijo
Xu B, Friedman D, Foster P, Jiang Y, Pardeshi A, Jiang Y. Anatomic changes and predictors of angle widening after laser peripheral iridotomy: the Zhongshan angle closure prevention trial. Ophthalmology. 2021;128(8):1161-8. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ophtha.2021.01.021
Dias A, Ferreira J, Abegao L, Domingues I, Silva JP, Cunha JP, et al. Phacoemulsification versus peripheral iridotomy in the management of chronic primary angle closure: long-term follow-up. Int Ophthalmol. 2019;35(2):173-8. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s19792-014-9926-8
Pérez H, Moreno J, Moreno L. Factores que influyen en la progresión del cierre angular primario posterior a iridotomía periférica láser. Rev Ciencias Médicas. 2020 [acceso 13/08/2023];24(5):1-9. Disponible en: https://www.medigraphic.com/cgi-bin/new/resumen.cgi?IDARTICULO=103129
Marcos S. Imagen cuantitativa del segmento anterior del ojo. Bol Dig Asoc Esp Tecnol Cir Impl Refr Córn. 2020 [acceso 13/08/2023];(11). Disponible en: http://www.vision.csic.es/Publications/Reviews/Imagen%20cuantitativa%20d
el%20segmento%20anterior%20del%20ojo.pdf
Natung T, Shullai W, Nongrum B, Thangkhiew L, Baruah P, Phiamphu M. Ocular biometry characteristics and corneal astigmatisms in cataract surgery candidates at a tertiary care center in North-East India. Ind J Ophthalmol. 2019;67:1417-23. DOI: https://doi.org/10.4103/ijo.IJO_1353_18
Yang C, Lim D, Kim H, Chung T. Comparison of two swept-source optical coherence tomography biometers and a partial coherence interferometer. PLoS One. 2019;14(10):e0223114. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1371/journal.pone.0223114
Saucedo R. Comparative analysis and repeatability assessment of IOL Master 500 versus IOL Master 700 biometry in cataract patients. Rev Mex Oftalmol. 2019;93(3):130-6. DOI: https://doi.org/10.24875/RMO.M19000067
Página web CSO. Book your appointment with CSO product specialist. MS39 AS-OCT-CSO. 2020 [acceso 13/08/2023]. Disponible en: https://www.csoitalia.it/en/prodotto/info/63-ms-39
Yoo Y. Use of the crystalline lens equatorial plane as a new parameter for predicting postoperative intraocular lens position. Am J Ophthalmol. 2019;198:17-24. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ajo.2018.09.005
Heidari Z, Mohammadpour M, Hashemi H, Jafarzadehpur E, Moghaddasi A, Yaseri M et al. Early diagnosis of subclinical keratoconus by wavefront parameters using Scheimpflug Placido and Hartmann-Shack based devices. Int Ophthalmol. 2020. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s10792-020-01334-3
Savini G, Schiano-Lomoriello D, Bono V, Abicca I. Repeatability of anterior segment measurements by optical coherence tomography combined with Placido disk corneal topography in eyes with keratoconus. Scient Rep. 2020 [acceso: 02/08/2023];10:1124. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1038/s41598-02057926-7
Vega-Estrada A. Corneal epithelial thickness intrasubject repeatability and its relation with visual limitation in keratoconus. Am J Ophthalmol. 2019;200:255-62. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ajo.2019.01.015
Downloads
Published
How to Cite
Issue
Section
License
Aquellos autores/as que tengan publicaciones con esta revista, aceptan los términos siguientes:
- Los autores/as conservarán sus derechos de autor y garantizarán a la revista el derecho de primera publicación de su obra, el cuál estará simultáneamente sujeto a la Licencia de reconocimiento de Creative Commons que permite a terceros compartir la obra siempre que se indique su autor y su primera publicación esta revista.
- Los autores/as podrán adoptar otros acuerdos de licencia no exclusiva de distribución de la versión de la obra publicada (p. ej.: depositarla en un archivo telemático institucional o publicarla en un volumen monográfico) siempre que se indique la publicación inicial en esta revista.
- Se permite y recomienda a los autores/as difundir su obra a través de Internet (p. ej.: en archivos telemáticos institucionales o en su página web) antes y durante el proceso de envío, lo cual puede producir intercambios interesantes y aumentar las citas de la obra publicada. (Véase El efecto del acceso abierto).
