Phacoemulsification (FACO) and decompensated angle-closure glaucoma

Authors

  • Lexei Hernández Magaz Hospital Hermanos Ameijeiras
  • Leidy Jacomino Hernández Hospital Hermanos Ameijeiras
  • Jesús Hernández Mena Hospital Hermanos Ameijeiras
  • Francisco García González Hospital Hermanos Ameijeiras
  • Leonid García Socorro Hospital Hermanos Ameijeiras

Keywords:

phacoemulsification/surgery, angle-closure glaucoma

Abstract

Objective: to study biometric gonioscopic changes, changes of the IOP, visual acuity, endothelial count and complications in eyes operated by phacoemulsification techniques (FACO) after the diagnosis of decompensated narrow-angle glaucoma.
Methods: a prospective, descriptive, non randomized study was conducted in 32 eyes of 21 patients with the diagnosis of decompensated narrow-angle glaucoma, with previous filtering surgery or without it, who were operated on by the FACO technique and implant of folding intraocular lens (IOL), by clear corneal and intracamerular topical anesthesia in the Ophtalmology Service of "Hermanos Ameijeiras" Surgical and Clinical Hospital. The patients were followed-up during the first week and the first, third and sixth months.
Results: the postoperative IOP values descended between 6 and 10 mmHg in relation to the ones found in the preoperative, with a mean of 6 mmHg at the 6 months. In most of the cases, the biometric values of the anterior chamber exceeded the 3 mm and the angles became open (Goldman gonioscopy). The BCVA achieved at the six months was between the 0.6 and 1, 0 with an average of 0.8. The postoperative endothelial cell count was 2 092 with a p = 0,000. Four patients (12.5 %) needed postoperative ocular hypotensive treatment. Only one patient experienced a collapse in the postoperative filtering bleb. The other two complications found were mild corneal edema and transoperative bleeding in some cases (3) that required intraoperative forced dilatation.
Conclusions: FACO surgery with folding intraocular lens implantation is a useful surgical alternative for the control of decompensated narrow-angle glaucoma that preserves or improves patients' visual acuity, with a low percent of complications.

Downloads

Download data is not yet available.

References

1. Tasman W, Jaeger E. Duane´s Clinical Ophthalmology. Filadelfia: Lippincott-Williams and Wilkins; 2009.

2. Ikmomi L, Marchini G, Marraffa M. Epidemiology of angle-closure glaucoma: prevalence, clinical types, and association with peripheral anterior chamber depth in the Egna Neumarkct Glaucom:l Study. Ophthalmology. 2010:107:998-1003.

3. Congdon N, Wang F, Tielsch M. Issues in the epidemiology and population· based screening of primary angle-closure glaucoma. Surgery Opthalmol. 1992;36:411-23.

4. Ilandona L, Dandona R, Mandai P. Angle-closureg1aucomain an urban population in southern India: the Andhra Pradesh Eye Disease Study. Ophthalmology. 2008;I07:171-6.

5. Quigley HA, Broman AT. The number of people with glaucoma worldwide in 2010 and 2020. Br J Ophthalmol. 2006;90:26-7.

6. Aung T, Nolan WP, Machin 0. Anterior chamber depth and the risk of primary angle closure in 2 East Asian populations. Arch Opllthalmol. 2005;123:527-32.

7. Devereux JG, Foster PJ, Baasanhu I. Anterior chamber depth measurement as a screening tool for primary angle-closure glaucoma in an East Asian population. Arch Ophtha/mol. 2008;118:257-63.

8. Galin MA, Baras I, Sambursky I. Glaucoma and cataract. Am J Ophthalmol. 1996;67:522-33.

9. Ritch R, Chang BM, Liebmann JM. Angle closure in younger patients. Ophthalmology. 2003;1190:1880-9.

10. Ritch R, Lowe RF. Angle closure glaucoma: mechanisms and epidemiology. Cap. 37. En: Ritch R, Shield MB, Krupin T, eds. The glaucomas. 2nd ed. St Louis: Mosby; 1996. p. 801-19.

11. Ming Zhi Z, Lim AS, Yin Wong T. A pilot study of lens extraction in the management of acute primary angle closure glaucoma. Am J Ophthalmol. 2005;135:534-6.

12. Jacobi PC, Dietlein TS, Krieglstein GK. Comparative study of trabecular aspiration vs trabeculectomy in glaucoma triple procedure to treat pseudoexfoliation glaucoma. Arch Ophthalmol. 1999;117:1311-8.

13. Hayashi K, Hayashi H, Nakao F. Changes in anterior chamber angle width and depth after intraocular lens implantation in eyes with glaucoma. Ophthalmology. 2000;107:698-703.

14. Shingleton BJ, Gamell LS, O'Donoghue MW. Long-term changes in intraocular pressure after clear corneal phacoemulsification: normal patients versus glaucoma suspect and glaucoma patients. J Cataract Refract Surg. 1999;25:885-90.

15. Hayashi K, Hayashi H, Nakao F, Hayashi F. Effect of cataract surgery on intraocular pressure control in glaucoma patients. J Cataract Refract Surg. 2009;27:1779-86.

16. Mathalone N, Hyams M, Neiman S. Longterm intraocular pressure control after clear corneal phacoemulsification in glaucoma patients. J Cataract Refract Surg. 2005;31:479-83.

17. Ravi T, Parikh R, Muliyil J, Kumar RS. five-year risk of progression of primary angle closure to primary angle closure glaucoma: a population-based study. Acta Ophthalmol Scan. 2003;81:480-5.

18. Friedman DS, Jampel HD, Lubomski LH. Surgical strategies for coexisting glaucoma and cataract: an evidence-based update. Ophthalmology. 2002;109:1902-15.

19. Chen PP, Budenz DL. The effects of cataract extraction on the visual field of eyes with chronic open-angle glaucoma. Am J Ophthalmol. 1998;125:325-33.

20. Hayashi, K. Effect of cataract surgery on intraocular pressure control in glaucoma patients. J Cataract Refract Surg. 2001;27(11):1779-86.

21. Jacobi PC. Primary phacoemulsification and intraocular lens implantation for acute angle-closure glaucoma. Ophthalmology. 2002;109(9):1597-603.

22. Shihota R, Lakshmaiah CN, Titiyal JS, Dada T, Agarwal HC. Corneal enothelial status in the subtypes of primary angle closure glaucoma. Clin Exp Ophthalmol. 2003;31:492-5.

23. Boyd B. El Arte y la ciencia en la cirugía de catarata. Panama Highlights Of

Ophthalmolohy; 2001. p.120-75.

24. Alió JL, Mulet ME. Phacoemulsification in the anterior chamber. J Cataract Refract Surg. 2002;28:67-75.

25. Laroche L, Dan A, Michel M. Cirugía de la Catarata. Barcelona: Masson; 2008.

26. Lindstrom. Conferencia de la reunión conjunta de Ocular Surgery News, la Sociedad Italiana de Oftalmología, la Asociación Italiana de Cirujanos de Catarata y Refractiva y la International Society of Refractive Surgery/American Academy of Ophthalmology. Ocular Surgery News, Latin America Edition September 1; 2006.

27. Badoza D. Glaucoma y catarata. En: Yankelevich JI, Grigera D, Casiragui J. Glaucoma. Buenos Aires: Consejo Argentino de Oftalmología. Salta: Universidad Católica de Salta; 2003. p. 535-545.

Published

2013-02-10

How to Cite

1.
Hernández Magaz L, Jacomino Hernández L, Hernández Mena J, García González F, García Socorro L. Phacoemulsification (FACO) and decompensated angle-closure glaucoma . Acta Médica [Internet]. 2013 Feb. 10 [cited 2025 Apr. 6];14(1). Available from: https://revactamedica.sld.cu/index.php/act/article/view/826

Issue

Section

Artículos originales