Importance of the Preanalytical Phase for the Clinical Laboratory

Authors

Keywords:

Key words, preanalytical phase, blood specimen collection by venipuncture, clinical laboratory, lab results.

Abstract

Introduction: The pre-analytical phase encompasses all the procedures before the start of laboratory testing. This phase of the testing process is responsible for the majority of the laboratory errors, since the related procedures involve many sorts of non-laboratory professionals working outside the laboratory setting, thus without direct supervision by the laboratory staff.

Objetive: The aim of this paper addressed to healthcare professionals is to highlight the importance of blood specimen management (from patient preparation to laboratory analyses), as a tool to prevent laboratory errors.

Methods: The review on this matter, including official documents of several international organizations of Clinical Lab, there is a consensus on those subjects that, although information and preparation of patients, the correct organization or management of both personnel and procedures that regard blood specimen collection by venipuncture are of fundamental importance, since the various steps for performing blood collection represent per se sources of laboratory variability.

Conclusions: Laboratory results from inappropriate blood specimens are inconsistent and do not allow proper treatment nor monitoring of the patient.

Downloads

Download data is not yet available.

Author Biography

Celia Angela Alonso Rodríguez, Hospital Clínico Quirúrgico ¨Hermanos Ameijeiras¨

Departamento de Laboratorio Clínico Tecnólogo de la Salud Profesora Auxiliar

References

Izaguirre Ascargorta, M; Fernández Landázuri, S; MuguetaUriaque, C; Martínez Espartosa, D; González Hernández, Á; Evaluación y comparación de métodos – En: González Hernández, A., Principios de bioquímica clínica y patología molecular, 4, 33-39, 3.ª edición. 2019, Elsevier España, S.L.U.

Manso Guadarrama, L L; Moré Chang, C X; Pérez de Alejo Rodríguez, L. Constancia en la labor educativa del método clínico vs la utilización del laboratorio clínico. EDUMECENTRO 2015;7(4):235-240

Hernández Betancourt, Jenny de la C, Serrano Barrera, O. R. Consideraciones sobre la integración del laboratorio al método clínico. Medisur, octubre 2016, Vol 14, Numero 5

Trimiño Galindo L, Padrón Ramos MJ, Guardarrama Linares L, García Cuervo D, Rubiera García JM. Método clínico vs laboratorio clínico. RevMéd Electrón [Internet]. 2011 Nov-Dic [consultado: 5-11-2020];33(6).

Schultze AE, Irizarry AR. Recognizing and reducing analytical errors and sources of variation in clinical pathology data in safety assessment studies. ToxicolPathol. 2017; 45:281-287

Lundberg GD. Acting on significant laboratory results. JAMA. 1981; 245:1762–3.

Plebani M, Lippi G. Closing the brain-to-brain loop in laboratory testing. Clin Chem Lab Med. 2011; 49:1131–3.

Carberry AR, Hanson K, Flannery A, et al. Diagnostic error in pediatric cancer. Clin Pediatr (Phila). 2018; 57:11-18.

Laposata M, Cohen MB. It’s our turn: implications for pathology from the institute of medicine’s report on diagnostic error. Arch Pathol Lab Med. 2016; 140:505-507.

Lippi G, Banfi G, Buttarello M, Ceriotti F, Daves M, Dolci A, et al. Recommendations for detection and management of unsuitable samples in clinical laboratories. Clin Chem Lab Med. 2007; 45:728–36.

Lippi G, Chance JJ, Church S, Dazzi P, Fontana R, Giavarina D, et al. Preanalytical quality improvement: from dream to reality. Clin Chem Lab Med. 2011; 49:1113–26.

Narayanan S, Guder WG. Preanalytical variables and their influence on the quality of laboratory results. eJIFCC, 2017, vol 13 no 1, http://www.ifcc.org/ejifcc/ vol13no1/1301200107.htm.

Lippi G, Banfi G, Church S, Cornes M, De Carli G, Grankvist K, et al. Preanalytical quality improvement. In pursuit of harmony, on behalf of European Federation for Clinical Chemistry and Laboratory Medicine (EFLM) Working group for Preanalytical Phase (WG-PRE). Clin Chem Lab Med 2015; 53: 357–70.

Lippi G. Governance of preanalytical variability: travelling the right path to the bright side of the moon? Clin ChimActa 2009; 404: 32–6.

Simundic AM. Preanalytical phase – an updated review of the current evidence. Biochem Med (Zagreb) 2014;24: 6.

Haverstick DM, Grosbach A. Specimen collection, Processing and Other Preanalytical Variables. In: Burtis CA, Bruns DE, eds. Tietz textbook of clinical chemistry and molecular diagnostics. St. Lous, Saunders, Elsevier, 2016.

Kiechle FL, Ed. So you’re going to collect a blood specimen: an introduction to phlebotomy. 14th ed. Northfield, Ill: College of American Pathologists, 2013.

Robb, J A;Bry, L;Sluss, P M; Wagar, EA; Kennedy, M F.College of American Pathologists Diagnostic Intelligence and Health Information Technology Biorepository Working Group. A Call to Standardize Preanalytic Data Elements for Biospecimens, Part II Arch Pathol Lab Med. 2015 Sep.;139(9):1125-8doi: 10.5858/arpa.2014-0572-CP. Epub 2015 Jan 16.

Kackov S, Simundic AM, Gatti-Drnic A. Are patients well informed about the fasting requirements for laboratory blood testing? Biochem Med (Zagreb) 2013;23:326-31. https://doi.org/10.11613/BM.2013.040

Lima-Oliveira G, Volanski W, Lippi G, Picheth G, Guidi GC. Preanalytical phase management: a review of the procedures from patient preparation to laboratory analysis. Scand J Clin Lab Invest 2017;77:153-63. https://doi.org/10.1080/00365513.2017.1295317

Cornes MP, Church S, van Dongen-Lases E, Grankvist K, Guimarães JT, Ibarz M, et al. Working Group for Preanalytical Phase (WG-PRE) and European Federation of Clinical Chemistry and Laboratory Medicine (EFLM). The role of European Federation of Clinical Chemistry and Laboratory Medicine Working Group for Preanalytical Phase in standardization and harmonization of the preanalytical phase in Europe. Ann Clin Biochem2016; 53:539-47. https://doi.org/10.1177/0004563216643969

Kackov S, Simundic AM, Gatti-Drnic A. Are patientsLippi G, Banfi G, Church S, Cornes M, De Carli G, Grankvist K,et al. Preanalytical quality improvement. In pursuit of harmony,on behalf of the European Federation for Clinical Chemistry andLaboratory Medicine (EFLM) Working Group for PreanalyticalPhase (WG-PRE). Clin Chem Lab Med. 2015; 53:357–70.

Benozzi SF, Unger G, Pennacchiotti GL. Fase preanalítica en un laboratorio clínico de Argentina: Cómo se instruye a los pacientes para sus análisis de sangre? Revista Electrónica de Ciencias de Laboratorio Clínico para Latinoamérica, España y Portugal. Diagnóstico in vitro 2017; 5:39-46. (in Spanish)

Lippi G, Salvagno GL, Lima-Oliveira G, Brocco G, Danese E, Guidi GC. Postural change during venous blood collection is a major source of bias in clinical chemistry testing. Clin Chim Acta 2015; 440:164-8. http://dx.doi. org/10.1016/j.cca.2014.11.024.

Lippi G, Salvagno GL, Lima-Oliveira G, Danese E, Favaloro EJ, Guidi GC. Influence of posture on routine hemostasis testing. Blood Coagul Fibrinolysis 2015; 26:716-9. http://dx.doi.org/10.1097/MBC.0000000000000326.

World Health Organization (WHO) guidelines on drawing blood: best practices in phlebotomy: WHO Press; 2010. 125 p.

Nikolac N, Simundic AM, Kackov S, Serdar T, Dorotic A, Fumic K, et al. The quality and scope of information provided by medical laboratories to patients before laboratory testing: Survey of the Working Group for Patient Preparation of the Croatian Society of Medical Biochemistry and Laboratory Medicine. Clin ChimActa 2015;450:104-9. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.cca.2015.08.001

Nikolac N, SimundicIchimura M, Sasaki S, Mori M, Ogino T. Tapping but not massage enhances vasodilation and improves venous palpation of cutaneous veins. Acta Med Okayama 2015; 69:79-85.

Lima-Oliveira G, Lippi G, Salvagno GL, Montagnana M, Manguera CL, Sumita NM, et al. New ways to deal with known preanalytical issues:use of transilluminator instead of tourniquet for easing vein access and eliminating stasis on clinical biochemistry. Biochem Med (Zagreb) 2011; 21:152-9. http://dx.doi.org/10.11613/BM.2011.024

Nikolac N, Supak-Smolcic V, Simundic AM, Celap I, Croatian Society of Medical B, Laboratory M. Croatian Society of Medical Biochemistry and Laboratory Medicine: national recommendations for venous blood sampling. Biochem Med (Zagreb) 2013; 23:242-54. http://dx.doi.org/10.11613/ BM.2013.031.

Simundic AM, Church S, Cornes MP, Grankvist K, Lippi G, Nybo M, et al. Compliance of blood sampling procedures with the CLSI H3-A6 guidelines: An observational study by the European Federation of Clinical Chemistry and Laboratory Medicine (EFLM) working group for the preanalytical phase (WG-PRE). Clin Chem Lab Med2015; 53:1321- 31. http://dx.doi.org/10.1515/cclm-2014-1053.

Alcaraz Quiles J, Rico Santana N, Bedini Chesa JL. Estabilidad de 27 magnitudes bioquímicas en muestras de suero conservadas en refrigeración. Rev Lab Clin 2014; 7:9-16. (in Spanish)

Ialongo C, Bernardini S. Phlebotomy, a bridge between laboratory and patient. Biochem Med (Zagreb) 2016;26: 17–33.

Ialongo C, Bernardini S. Preanalytical investigations of phlebotomy: methodological aspects, pitfalls and recommendations. Biochem Med (Zagreb) 2017; 27:177-91. https://doi.org/10.11613/BM.2017.020

Lippi G, Baird GS, Banfi G, Bölenius K, Cadamuro J, Church S, et al. Improving quality in the preanalytical phase through innovation, on behalf of the European Federation for Clinical Chemistry and Laboratory Medicine (EFLM) Working Group for Preanalytical Phase (WG-PRE). Clin Chem Lab Med 2017; 55: 489–500.

Ferraro S, Braga F, Panteghini M. Laboratory medicine in the new healthcare environment. Clin Chem Lab Med. 2016; 54:523-33. https://doi.org/10.1515/cclm-2015-0803

Orth M, Averina M, Chatzipanagiotou S, Faure G, Haushofer A, Kusec V, et al. Opinion: redefining the role of the physician in laboratory medicine in the context of emerging technologies, personalised medicine and patient autonomy (‘4P medicine’). J Clin Pathol. 2019;72:191-7. https://doi.org/10.1136/jclinpath-2017-204734

American Association for Clinical Chemistry (AACC). LabTests Online. Available at: https://labtestsonline.org/. Accessed 7th May 2020.

Cerón Pérez JA, Salinas Argente R. Gestión de laboratorios. In: Gestiónhospitalaria [Internet]. 5ta. ed. McGraw-Hill Medical; 2011. Available f r o m :http://accessmedicina. mhmedical.com/content.aspx?bookid=1492&sectionid=98858383.

Killeen A A. Laboratorio clínico en la atención médica moderna. In: Kasper D, Fauci A, Hauser S, Longo D, Jameson JL, Loscalzo J. En: Harrison. Principios de Medicina Interna. 19a. ed. 2016. Availablefrom:http://harrisonmedicina.mhmedical.com/ content.aspx?bookid=1717&sectionid=114944602.

Carmona EE. Los exámenes de Laboratorio Clínico en el siglo XXI: ¿a favor o en contra del método clínico? Gaceta Médica Espirituana. 2017;12(3). Disponible en: http://revgmespirituana.sld.cu/index.php/gme/article/view/1546

Moreno Rodríguez MA. ¿Análisis Complementarios vs. Método Clínico? Revista Habanera de Ciencias Médicas. 2014;13(5):650-6. Disponible en: http://www.medigraphic.com /pdfs/revhabciemed/hcm-2014/hcm145a.pdf

Harvey Y. Abnormal full blood count in the asymptomatic patient. Common sense pathology. Royal College of Pathologists of Australia. Clin Biochem. 2019;1–12.16.

Plebani M. Towards a new paradigm in laboratory medicine: the five rights. Clin Chem Lab Med. 2016; 4:1881–1891.23

Masood, A and Karim, MI. The Clinical Approach on Receipt of an Unexpected Laboratory Test Result. International Journal of General Medicine 2020:13 969–976 969

http://doi.org/10.2147/IJGM.S269299

Mrazek C; Lippi M; Keppel MH; Felder TK;Oberkofler H; Haschke-Becher E;Cadamuro J. Errors within the total laboratory testing process, from test selection to medical decision-making - A review of causes, consequences, surveillance and solutions. 2020 Jun 15;30(2):020502. doi:10.11613/BM.2020.020502

Sonmez C, Yıldız U, Akkaya N, Taneli F. Cureus. Preanalytical Phase Errors: Experience of a Central Laboratory. 2020 Mar 20; 12(3):e7335. doi: 10.7759/cureus.7335. PMID: 32313776.

Cornes M, van Dongen-Lases E, Grankvist K, Ibarz M, Kristensen G, Lippi G, Nybo M, Simundic AM; Working Group for Preanalytical Phase (WG-PRE), European Federation of Clinical Chemistry and Laboratory Medicine (EFLM). Order of blood draw: Opinion Paper by the European Federation for Clinical Chemistry and Laboratory Medicine (EFLM) Working Group for the Preanalytical Phase (WG-PRE). Clin Chem Lab Med. 2017 Jan 1;55(1):27-31. doi: 10.1515/cclm-2016-0426. PMID: 27444170.

Published

2021-05-04

How to Cite

1.
Alonso Rodríguez CA. Importance of the Preanalytical Phase for the Clinical Laboratory. Acta Médica [Internet]. 2021 May 4 [cited 2025 Apr. 3];22(1). Available from: https://revactamedica.sld.cu/index.php/act/article/view/167

Issue

Section

Artículo de opinión