Axillary Augmentation Mastoplasty without Endoscope
Keywords:
Augmentation mastoplasty, axillary approach, endoscope.Abstract
Introduction: Augmentation mastoplasty is one of the most common plastic surgery procedures in those women who are not satisfied with the size of their breasts. It was the plastic surgeon Hoeler who, in 1973, performed the first axillary breast augmentation. The absence of scars in the mammary region and the better control in the positioning of the inframammary groove are among the main advantages of this surgical technique.
Objective: to evaluate the results of axillary augmentation mastoplasty, with no endoscope.
Methods: A descriptive, prospective, longitudinal-cut study was conducted in patients diagnosed with breast hypoplasia at “Hermanos Ameijeiras” Surgical Clinical Hospital from March 2016 to March 2019. The sample consisted of 18 patients.
Results: The average age of the patients was 27.1±3.8 years, with predominance of those with white skin color (66.7%). Surgical wound dehiscence was the only postoperative complication for 5.6%; adequate cosmetic results were predominant (72.1%). The volume of the implant placed was between 226 and 250 cc (44.4%). The good result at the end of the treatment predominated (72.1%), all the patients felt satisfied.
Conclusions: Axillary augmentation mastoplasty with no endoscope is a safe and easy option to perform for patients who do not want a visible scar on the breast, it offers good results with very low percentage of complications
Downloads
References
Referencias bibliográficas
Tamayo Carbón AM, Orozco Jaramillo MA, Rendón Oliva IE, Posada Ruiz DA, Valdivia Llanes J. Resultados en mastoplastia reductora por técnica de McKissock modificada en la hipertrofia mamaria moderada. Acta Médica. 2020[acceso:25/06/2021];21(1):e42. Disponible en http://www.revactamedica.sld.cu/index.php/act/article/view/42/pdf
Tamayo Carbon AM, Vila Garcia E, Valdivia Llanes JT, Reyes Perez AO, Cuastumal Figueroa DK. Reductive Mastoplasty with Medial Pedicle Flap in Patients with Symptomatic Breast Hypertrophy. Int J Transplant & Plastic Surg. 2020;4(2):000152. DOI: https://doi.org/10.23880/ijtps-16000152
Messa CA. One-Stage Augmentation Mastopexy: A Retrospective Ten-Year Review of 2183 Consecutive Procedures. Aesthet Surg J. 2019;39(12):1352-67. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1093/asj/sjz143
Lee DW, Kim SJ, Kim H. Endoscopic Transaxillary Versus Inframammary Approaches for Breast Augmentation Using Shaped Implants: A Matched Case-Control Study. Aesthetic Plast Surg. 2019;43(3):563-8. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s00266-019-01324-6
Vallarta Rodriguez RA, Ruiz Treviño JJ, Guerrero Burgos F. Mamaplastia de aumento inteligente manipulando vectores tisulares. Cirugía Plástica. 2014[acceso:25/06/2021];24 (1):40-9. Disponible en: https://www.medigraphic.com/pdfs/cplast/cp-2014/cp141e.pdf
Li Z, Mu D, Xu B, Wang C, Cheng H, Li S, Qi J. Drainage Collection After Endoscopic-Assisted Transaxillary Dual-Plane Augmentation Mammaplasty Using Cold or Electrosurgical Separation of Interpectoral Space. Plast Surg (Oakv). 2020;28(1):19-28. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1177/2292550319880913
Calderón JM, Carriquiry C. Actualidad en mastoplastia de aumento. Horiz Med 2016[acceso:25/06/2021];16(2):54-62. Disponible en: http://www.scielo.org.pe/pdf/hm/v16n2/a10v16n2.pdf
Sim HB. Tran’s axillary endoscopic breast augmentation. Arch Plast Surg. 2014;41(5):458-65. DOI: https://doi.org/10.5999/aps.2014.41.5.458
Peter C. Neligan. Cirugía Plástica Mama. 3ra. Ed. Panamá: Amolca: 2017. pp. 81-96.
Strock LL. Reoperative Transaxillary Approach Algorithm: Extending the Surgical Alternatives for Secondary Breast Augmentation in the Era of Scarless Surgery. Aesthet Surg J. 2020;40(11):1193-5. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1093/asj/sjaa046
Foissac R, Camuzard O, Fernández J, Levy J. A Modified Patient Positioning for Transaxillary Breast Augmentation. Aesthetic Plast Surg. 2017;41(1):228-31. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s00266-016-0766-y
Streit L, Dražan L, Novák P, Schneiderová M, Dvořák Z, Teplá K, et al. Lipomodelling - advanced technique for the correction of Congenital hypoplastic breast malformations and deformities. Acta Chir Plast. 2016;58(2):70-6. PMID: 28079392.
Buenrostro Vásquez C, Buck Soltero JA, Morales Valle LA, Granados Tinajero SO. Anestesia en liposucción de grandes volúmenes. Anestesia en México. 2017[acceso:25/06/2021];29(1):64-76. Disponible en: http://www.scielo.org.mx/pdf/am/v29s1/2448-8771-am-29-00064.pdf
Huang GJ, Wichmann JL, Mills DC. Transaxillary subpectoral augmentation mammaplasty: a single surgeon's 20-year experience. Aesthet Surg J. 2011;31(7):781-801. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1177/1090820X11416936
Li S, Mu D, Liu C, Xin M, Fu S, Xu B, et al. Complications Following Subpectoral Versus Prepectoral Breast Augmentation: A Meta-analysis. Aesthetic Plast Surg. 2019;43(4):890-8. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s00266-019-01404-7
Pelle Ceravolo M, Del Vescovo A, Bertozzi E. A technique to decrease breast shape deformity during muscle contraction in submuscular augmentation mammaplasty. Aesthetic Plast Surg. 2004;28:288-94. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s00266-003-3023-0
Becker H, Fregosi N. The Impact of Animation Deformity on Quality of Life in Post-Mastectomy Reconstruction Patients. Aesthet Surg J. 2017;37(5):531-6. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1093/asj/sjw264
Gryskiewicz J, LeDuc R. Transaxillary Nonendoscopic Subpectoral Augmentation Mammaplasty: A 10-Year Experience With Gel vs. Saline in 2000 Patients-With Long-Term Patient Satisfaction Measured by the BREAST-Q. Aesthet Surg J. 2014;34(5):696-713. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1177/1090820X14530552
Weck AC. Comparative analysis of endoscopic transaxillary augmentation mammoplasty without endoscopic assistance. Rev Bras Cir Plás. 2013[acceso:25/06/2021];28(3):348-58. Disponible en: http://www.rbcp.org.br/details/1424/comparative-analysis-of-endoscopic-transaxillary-augmentation-mammaplasty-without-endoscopic-assistance
Danillaa S, Ríos MA, Cuevas P, Troncoso E, Domínguez C, Jara R, et al. Cambios en la calidad de vida en mujeres sometidas a aumento mamario. Resultados preliminares de un estudio de cohortes. Rev Chil Cir. 2016;68(4):289-94. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1016/j.rchic.2015.12.001
Albornoz CR, Pusic AL, Danilla S. Evaluación de resultados quirúrgicos desde la perspectiva del paciente. Rev Med Clin Condes. 2016;27:107-12. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1016/j.rmclc.2016.01.013
Downloads
Published
How to Cite
Issue
Section
License
Aquellos autores/as que tengan publicaciones con esta revista, aceptan los términos siguientes:
- Los autores/as conservarán sus derechos de autor y garantizarán a la revista el derecho de primera publicación de su obra, el cuál estará simultáneamente sujeto a la Licencia de reconocimiento de Creative Commons que permite a terceros compartir la obra siempre que se indique su autor y su primera publicación esta revista.
- Los autores/as podrán adoptar otros acuerdos de licencia no exclusiva de distribución de la versión de la obra publicada (p. ej.: depositarla en un archivo telemático institucional o publicarla en un volumen monográfico) siempre que se indique la publicación inicial en esta revista.
- Se permite y recomienda a los autores/as difundir su obra a través de Internet (p. ej.: en archivos telemáticos institucionales o en su página web) antes y durante el proceso de envío, lo cual puede producir intercambios interesantes y aumentar las citas de la obra publicada. (Véase El efecto del acceso abierto).
