Surgical Management of a Capsular Contracture After Breast Implant
Keywords:
Keywords, capsular contracture, capsulectomy, partial capsulectomy, total capsulectomy, surgical management.Abstract
Introduction: Augmentation mammoplasty with implants is one of the most frequent and common procedures in plastic surgery, while capsular contracture is, in turn, the most frequent of its complications. In recent years, there has been an increase in the number of patients who attend consultation for breast dysmorphia with this complication. However, there is no performance protocol to solve it. For this reason, the motivation arises for the development of this study, with the aim of showing the outcomes of surgical management with the use of various procedures.
Objective: To describe the outcomes of surgical management of patients with capsular contracture at Hermanos Ameijeiras Hospital between August 1, 2012 and March 31, 2019.
Methods: Descriptive, longitudinal and ambispective study carried out with 32 patients from the plastic surgery and caumatology department.
Results: In the study, grade III capsular contracture prevailed in 62.5% of the sample. The most widely used technique was partial capsulectomy with implant change and plane change. There were no major complications and all patients were satisfied with the outcomes obtained.
Conclusions: It is concluded that the techniques for the surgical managment of capsular contracture at Hermanos Ameijeiras Hospital provide good outcomes, based on the low presence of complications and the high degree of satisfaction with the outcomes obtained.
Downloads
References
Jewell M. Silicone gel breast implants at 50: the state of the science. Aesthet Surg J. 2012;32(8):1031-4.
Bresnick SD. Prophylactic leukotriene inhibitor therapy for the reduction of capsular contracture in primary silicone breast augmentation: experience with over 1100 cases. Plastic Reconstr Surg. 2017;139(2):379-85. DOI:
1097/PRS.0000000000003006
Piña Martínez V, Castro Sierra A. Factores etiológicos implicados en la contractura capsular en mamoplastia de aumento estética: estudio prospectivo observacional. Cir Plast Iberolatinoam. 2016[acceso:10/1/2020];42(1):13-20. Disponible en: http://scielo.isciii.es/pdf/cpil/v42n1/estetica2.pdf
Mares Morales RC, Mares Dehesa P, Linares Rodríguez MF, Guevara Cervantes JF, Fuente A. Eficacia del recambio de implantes mamarios y el cambio de plano quirúrgico en el tratamiento de la contractura capsular tipo Baker. Cirugía Plástica. 2018;28(1):14-22. DOI: 10.35366/CP181C
Medina FM, Abello Calle J, Garcia Ledesma OE, Echeverry JC. Implantes mamarios, eventos adversos y complicaciones poco frecuentes: Hallazgos por mamografía, ecografía y resonancia magnética. Rev. Colomb. Radiol. 2016[acceso:10/2/2020];27(2):4434-40. Disponible en: https://www.webcir.org/revistavirtual/articulos/2016/3_agosto/col/implantes_ esp.pdf
Planas J. Tratamiento de la contractura capsular periprotésica. Fundación Jaime Planas. 2018. [acceso:10/1/2020]. Disponible en: https://www.clinicaplanas.com/files/0001/planas1212b127y128ytty775737219/w eb.system/assets/contents/articulos/articulo22/articulo22.htm
Tamayo Carbón AM, Ramos Amezquita LM. Surgical treatment of postmastoplasty impound improvement deformities. International journal of transplantation and plastic surgery. 2019;3(2):1-8. DOI: 10.23880/ijtps-16000S2008
Hidalgo DA, Sinno S. Current trends and controversies in breast augmentation. Plast Reconstr Surg. 2016;137:1142-50. DOI: doi.org/10.1097/01.prs.0000481110.31939.e4
Headon H, Kasem A, Mokbels K. Capsular contracture after breast augmentation: an update for clinical practice. Arch Plast Surg. 2015;42:532-43. DOI: 10.5999/aps.2015.42.5.532
Brown T. Plane Change Vs Capsulotomy: A Comparison of Treatments for Capsular Contraction in Breast Augmentation Using the Subfascial Plane. Aesthetic Plast Surg. 2020. Online ahead of print. DOI: 10.1007/s00266-020-02010-8
Swanson E. Open capsulotomy: an effective but overlooked treatment for capsular contracture after breast augmentation. Plast Reconstr Surg Glob Open. 2016;4(10):e1096. DOI: 10.1097/GOX.0000000000001096
Moufarrege R, Beauregard G, Bosse JP. Outcome of mammary capsulotomies. Ann Plast Surg. 1987;19(1):62–4. DOI: 10.1097/00000637-198707000-00010
Lam MC, Walgenbach Brünagel G, Pryalukhin A, Vorhold J, Pech T, Kalff JC. Management of capsular contracture in cases of silicone gel breast implant rupture with use of pulse lavage and open capsulotomy. Aesthetic Plast Surg. 2019;43(5):1173-85. DOI: 10.1007/s00266-019-01463-w
Coombs DM, Grover R, Prassinos A, Gurunluoglu R. Breast augmentation surgery: clinical considerations. Cleve Clin J Med. 2019;86(2):111-22. DOI: 10.3949/ccjm.86a.18017
Tbitblbaum S. Augmetation mammaplasty: principles, techniques, implant choices and complications. In: Thorne C. Grabb and smith´s plastic surgery. 7ma. ed. España: Wolters Kluwer. 2014:565-81.
Brown MH. Mastoplastia de aumento secundaria. En: Neligan PC. Cirugía plástica. 3ra. ed. Venezuela: Amolca. 2017:39.
Guridi R, Arriagadas J. Cirugía de aumento mamario. Rev Med Clin Condes. 2010;21(1):107-12. DOI: 10.1016/S0716-8640(10)70512-5
Liu X, Zhou L, Pan F, Gao Y, Yuan X, Fan D. Comparison of the postoperative incidence rate of capsular contracture among different breast implants: a cumulative meta-analysis. PLoS One. 2015;10(2):e0116071. DOI: 10.1371/journal.pone.0116071
Shauly O, Gould DJ, Patel KM. Microtexture and the cell/biomaterial interface: a systematic review and meta-analysis of capsular contracture and prosthetic breast implants. Aesthet Surg J. 2019;39(6):603-14. DOI: 10.1093/asj/sjy178
Brown T. Surface areas of textured breast implants: implications for the biofilm theory of capsule formation. Plastic Reconstr Surg Global Open. 2018;6(3):e1700. DOI: 10.1097/GOX.0000000000001700
Pardo R, Quintana R, Piñero A, Vázquez C, Cabañas J, Martínez Regueira F. Linfoma anaplásico de células grandes asociado a implantes mamarios. Documento de consenso (I): epidemiología, patogenia, clínica y diagnóstico. Rev Senol Patol Mamar. 2019;32(2):61-6. DOI: 10.1016/j.senol.2019.05.001
Rastogi P, Riordan E, Moon D Deva AK. Theories of etiopathogenesis of breast implant–associated anaplastic large cell lymphoma. Plastic Reconstr Surg. 2019;143: 23s-9s. DOI: 10.1097/PRS.0000000000005566
Shen Z, Chen X, Sun J, Chiu C, Yu Y, Lin X. A comparative assessment of three planes of implant placement in breast augmentation: a bayesian analysis. J Plast Reconstr Aesthet Surg. 2019;72(12):1986-95. DOI: 10.1016/j.bjps.2019.09.010
Tevlin R, Borrelli MR, Irizarry D, NguyenD, Wan DC, Momeni A. Acellular dermal matrix reduces myofibroblastpresence in the breast capsule. Plastic Reconstr Surg Global Open. 2019;7(5):e2213. DOI: 10.1097/GOX.0000000000002213
Moreno GI, Ribera PM. Mastopexia y prótesis: revisión a los 5 años. Cir Plas Iberolatinoam. 2006[acceso:10/1/2020];32(2):107-16. Disponible en: http://scielo.isciii.es/pdf/cpil/v32n2/05.pdf
Downloads
Published
How to Cite
Issue
Section
License
Aquellos autores/as que tengan publicaciones con esta revista, aceptan los términos siguientes:
- Los autores/as conservarán sus derechos de autor y garantizarán a la revista el derecho de primera publicación de su obra, el cuál estará simultáneamente sujeto a la Licencia de reconocimiento de Creative Commons que permite a terceros compartir la obra siempre que se indique su autor y su primera publicación esta revista.
- Los autores/as podrán adoptar otros acuerdos de licencia no exclusiva de distribución de la versión de la obra publicada (p. ej.: depositarla en un archivo telemático institucional o publicarla en un volumen monográfico) siempre que se indique la publicación inicial en esta revista.
- Se permite y recomienda a los autores/as difundir su obra a través de Internet (p. ej.: en archivos telemáticos institucionales o en su página web) antes y durante el proceso de envío, lo cual puede producir intercambios interesantes y aumentar las citas de la obra publicada. (Véase El efecto del acceso abierto).
